Superglam review

 

Avoid Superglam like the plague. There's nothing special about this website. The models, technical quality, video work, and pictures are less than impressive. Updates are sparse. This website is barely arousing. It's obvious that the makers didn't care enough about its customers to hire attractive women, a professional camera crew, and a talented web designer. I think they were just trying to make a quick buck by hiring European girls for cheap and charging way too much ($30 for one month) for their material.

Visit Superglam
 
 
 
34
Poor
 

Points/USD: 1.14

Entertainment: 14/35   The girls are nothing special. What they do is kind of boring and extremely faked.
Technical content: 10/25   My girlfriend could make better videos with our digital camera.
Usability: 4/15   The website is pretty difficult to navigate and it just looks bad.
Updates: 5/25   Updates are disorganized and very few.
 
 
 
Date: 2009-03-09
Written by: Graham Stroker

Categories:
Babes, Softcore, Glamour, Photography, Pornstar, Videos

Tags:
European girls
 
Superglam screenshot

Concept and Introduction

The concept here is allegedly glamorous shots of predominately European models either solo (with or without toys) or with other girls. The website, aside from some toy play and girl on girl action, is soft core. Most of the website is dedicated to girls taking off their clothes and using toys on themselves. There isn't a guy on the site, meaning there is no hardcore action between the models and another man. Most of the action takes place inside, but there are some pretty outdoor settings.

 

Porn Talk

The website fails to keep to its promise of super glamor. The models are nothing special. I'd even go as far to say as some of them are quite unattractive. The composition of the pictures is abysmal, as if the website employed incredibly amateur photographers. For example, the lighting in most of the pictures needs to be increased. There are some pretty outdoor scenes though.

The technical quality of the website, photographs, and videos needs a lot of work. The sloppiness detracts from the few pretty models that actually did something stimulating. Oh, that's right. The content is rather dull. I'd hardly classify it as arousing. I don't even think new material would help, not that there is very much of it. There could be way more updates a week. Though there is bonus material-backstage action, casting calls, and interviews - the quality is just abysmal and not worth watching. There's also a web cam show once on Monday through Wednesday, twice on Thursday, Friday & Sunday, and three times on Saturday. Judging from the preview clips, I would hardly call this an added bonus.

 

Tech Talk

The photographs come in sizes marked 1000, 2000, 4000. I assume this means small, medium, and large. The small pictures are 500x750, the medium photos are 600x900, and the large ones are 1024x1536. Makes no sense. Resolution wise, the pictures look nice. However, the pictures are too dark most of the time and the models cannot pose very well. The latter is most likely the fault of the photographer(s). There aren't very many pictures in a set. Sometimes there are fewer than 50 images! The average is less than 100, although sometimes there are as many as 115 a set.

The videos can be streamed or downloaded. The quality is not an improvement either. The format for the downloaded movies is a 786x576 MPG. There are even lower resolution videos as well (640x480). A bit rate is not listed, but you can bet that it's quite low as the videos are quite poor in quality. The videos come in sixteen parts, making the website friendlier to people with slower connections. One movie can be downloaded or viewed all at once.

There are problems with the updates. On the home page, there are updates, but they are not organized very neatly. On the update page itself, it was stated that the next update (singular) wasn't arriving until in couple of weeks. They entire layout of the website is also a bit sloppy.

 

Small Talk and Personal Opinion

I really disliked Superglam. Everything could use a lot of work. For starters, the models are average, although sometimes they are worse and rarely are they better. Most of them are very bad at faking both erotic expressions, body poses, and noise. Faking that obvious really interferes with arousal. On top of that, there are many models with botched breast implants. Those can be very unpleasant to see.

The website itself is not very impressive. The layout could use a massive overhaul. It is ugly and hard to navigate. Despite being two separate sections for updates, they are not synchronized with each other. One lists updates at a semi-frequent rate, while another suggests that only one update will be arriving next week. These details could be fixed if someone paid attention.

Both the videos and the pictures suffer from terrible quality. In fact, the videos are really bad. It's like the videographers used a crappy hand held camera. As for the photographs, they are drab and don't inspire the hand to gravitate towards the loins.

 

Pricing

PricePeriodRebillsAdditional Info
USD 29.95 1 month / 30 daysRebills after every period
USD 59.95 3 months / 90 daysRebills after every period
 
Payment Processors:
Price Global Limited. Credit Card, EU Bank Wires, Check, Phone.
 

Conclusion

To put it politely, every aspect of Superglam could use a lot of work. To put it bluntly, go someplace else before any already mustered arousal vanishes. Don't waste your money or time. There's way better (and cheaper!) material out there. Just search around for something hot. Stay clear of Superglam, unless of course you want to read the other bad reviews members gave of the site's quality and content.



Click here to visit Superglam

Screenshots

Screenshot from Superglam Screenshot from Superglam Screenshot from Superglam Screenshot from Superglam Screenshot from Superglam

Preview Gallery

Image sample from Superglam Image sample from Superglam Image sample from Superglam Image sample from Superglam Image sample from Superglam



External Opinions

What do others critics think of this site? To make comparison easy for you, here is an average score based on their rankings as well as links to them so you can research yourself.

  • Name
    Date
    Score
  • Name
    Date
    Score
Total average: 82/100


User Opinions

Have you been a member? Let us know what your opinion is and which score it deserves based on your experiences.

UserOpinionScore

You

Today, in a moment
Member for x Months

Be the first to share your experience.

?
 
Average: ?/5
  • [1..5]
  • Refresh image