Superglam

Superglam Screencap
Visit Site
Quick Facts
Downloadable movies
Flash player
Free of drm protection
High def movies
Part of site network
Pictures (non-screenshots)
Primarily exclusive content
Streaming movies
Zip packed pictures
Categories
Tags

Reviewed by admin over 9 years ago.

1 month / 30 days
$29.95
Score
34.0 /100

Avoid Superglam like the plague. There's nothing special about this website. The models, technical quality, video work, and pictures are less than impressive. Updates are sparse. This website is barely arousing. It's obvious that the makers didn't care enough about its customers to hire attractive women, a professional camera crew, and a talented web designer. I think they were just trying to make a quick buck by hiring European girls for cheap and charging way too much ($30 for one month) for their material.

Entertainment
Below average
40.0/100

The girls are nothing special. What they do is kind of boring and extremely faked.

Content
Below average
40.0/100

My girlfriend could make better videos with our digital camera.

Usability
Poor
26.7/100

The website is pretty difficult to navigate and it just looks bad.

Updates
Very poor
20.0/100

Updates are disorganized and very few.

Pricing

PricePeriodRebillsAdditional Info
Best Deal
$29.95 1 month / 30 daysRebills after every period
$59.95 3 months / 90 daysRebills after every period

Payment Processors: Price Global Limited. Credit Card, EU Bank Wires, Check, Phone.

Concept And Introduction

The concept here is allegedly glamorous shots of predominately European models either solo (with or without toys) or with other girls. The website, aside from some toy play and girl on girl action, is soft core. Most of the website is dedicated to girls taking off their clothes and using toys on themselves. There isn't a guy on the site, meaning there is no hardcore action between the models and another man. Most of the action takes place inside, but there are some pretty outdoor settings.

Porn Talk

The website fails to keep to its promise of super glamor. The models are nothing special. I'd even go as far to say as some of them are quite unattractive. The composition of the pictures is abysmal, as if the website employed incredibly amateur photographers. For example, the lighting in most of the pictures needs to be increased. There are some pretty outdoor scenes though.

Tech Talk

The photographs come in sizes marked 1000, 2000, 4000. I assume this means small, medium, and large. The small pictures are 500x750, the medium photos are 600x900, and the large ones are 1024x1536. Makes no sense. Resolution wise, the pictures look nice. However, the pictures are too dark most of the time and the models cannot pose very well. The latter is most likely the fault of the photographer(s). There aren't very many pictures in a set. Sometimes there are fewer than 50 images! The average is less than 100, although sometimes there are as many as 115 a set.

Small Talk And Personal Opinion

I really disliked Superglam. Everything could use a lot of work. For starters, the models are average, although sometimes they are worse and rarely are they better. Most of them are very bad at faking both erotic expressions, body poses, and noise. Faking that obvious really interferes with arousal. On top of that, there are many models with botched breast implants. Those can be very unpleasant to see.

Conclusion

To put it politely, every aspect of Superglam could use a lot of work. To put it bluntly, go someplace else before any already mustered arousal vanishes. Don't waste your money or time. There's way better (and cheaper!) material out there. Just search around for something hot. Stay clear of Superglam, unless of course you want to read the other bad reviews members gave of the site's quality and content.

Superglam Screencaps

Superglam Screencap
Superglam Screencap
Superglam Screencap
Superglam Screencap

Sample Pics

Superglam Pic
Superglam Pic
Superglam Pic
Superglam Pic
Superglam Pic